The use of drones in the agriculture industry for pesticide application has been growing so popular in recent years that it’s time for outdated rules and regulations to catch up with the trend. Ryan V. Petty wrote in Harvard Journal of Law & Technology that existing laws are hurting farmers and businesses, stating that “current regulations fail to reflect technological advancements in aerial pesticide application, create barriers to entry, and reduce competitiveness.”
Petty outlined a few regulatory hurdles currently facing drones:
FAA pesticide regulations do not reflect the unique nature of drones.
Drones compared to a traditional helicopter or plane has more benefits such as flying lower, they are smaller, and can hover in place for longer periods of time. They can be effectively be controlled independently, have pre-programmed mapping and GPS.
Inability to waive hazardous material transport restriction further prevents the use of drones in aerial pesticide application.
Drones are forbidden from carrying hazardous materials that include active ingredients in pesticides, these chemicals would be banned from transport unless a time-consuming exemption was granted.
EPA pesticide regulations require modification in light of new drone uses.
Among the requirements of a pesticide label are instructions on how to apply, e.g, by helicopter, fixed-wing aircraft, or both. This is to minimize the risk of pesticides drifting to non-target areas and protect neighboring crops and workers. Drones offer the benefit of applying pesticides closer and reducing the concern for drift—as well as substituting hand-application methods.
Currently, there are three FAA exemption and waiver processes that a drone operator would need to navigate through to dispense pesticides, depending on the drone type:
- Section 333 exemptions (drones over 55 Ibs)
- Part 107 Waivers for drones (smaller drones)
- Part 11 exemptions (permit relief from a vast array of FAA regulations)
Petty argues that updates to the FAA and EPA regulations dealing with aerial pesticide application are long overdue, especially in the emergence of drones being a possible safer and cheaper substitute for traditional methods. But until regulations get improved, a combination of section 333 exemptions, part 107 waivers, and section 11 exemptions are a viable and burdensome process.